Want to help support Obscanity.com?
Use my Shopping Portal to make your holiday purchases! It won't cost you an extra cent, but it'll help support this site. Doing all your shopping at Amazon.com? Go there now!







Netflix, Inc.



Blingo



Politeness, tact, and diplomacy: Signs of weakness? McCain thinks so!

September 27th, 2008 [Election 2008, General, Law & Politics, News, Television, US, YouTube]

10 Comments »

Wow. John McCain’s campaign has been putting out some pretty desperate ads, but this one just takes the cake.

This ad pretty much crystallizes one of the key differences between Republican and Democratic thinking, at least in the present climate of divisive politics. Democrats – or at least, the kind of Democrats who support Obama – recognize that for any given issue, there is a black, and there is a white, but there are also countless shades of gray, and typically the truth falls somewhere in that ambiguous area. Not always, of course, but when it comes to certain issues, you cannot simply boil it down to a Right and a Wrong. After all, as they say in “Wicked,” “There are precious few at ease with moral ambiguities, and so we act as though they don’t exist!”

On the other hand, for many Republicans, especially the knee-jerk Republicans we seem to see as mainstream candidates these days, there is only a Right and a Wrong, and a Yes and a No, and if you even pause to THINK about the complexity of the issue, or about the space between Yes and No, then you are part of the No. They don’t understand that you can be right AND wrong. They don’t understand that two people can agree about a problem and disagree about a solution.

For a Democrat like Obama, it would seem natural, in a debate, to acknowledge when the opponent is right about certain things, and follow up with an explanation of why their interpretation of those things is still not the best, why some of the details are wrong, why something has been mischaracterized, or why they disagree with the solution to fixing those things, if they’re broken. For Obama to say, “John is right, but…” or “John is right, and we agree on that issue…” seems perfectly natural to us.

For the kind of Republicans who patched this ad together, this is a sign of weakness. The willingness to recognize the skill or knowledge of your opponent makes you a bad leader, in their eyes. Cooperation is weakness. Diplomacy is weakness. Mediation is weakness. Politeness is weakness. To them, you have to be a pit bull in lipstick. You can’t work things out; you have to WIN, at any cost. To them, there is a right, and there is a wrong, and for every Good Guy, there is a Bad Guy. There can’t be two Good Guys who are just different. One of them has to be Bad. And it’s true that sometimes this is the case – but sometimes you’re just talking about two people who want to do good but disagree on the meaning of “good,” or two people who want to fix the same problem but have very different solutions.

This is setting aside the reality that every single one of Obama’s acknowledgments of McCain’s accuracy on a point was followed by a “but,” which was meticulously edited out by the commercial’s creators. Never mind that it mischaracterizes Obama’s opinion of McCain’s beliefs and strategies (and tactics) and completely ignores that he had a strong rebuttal for each point. As far as I’m concerned, that is the obvious problem with the ad, and I don’t think people will fall for it. Not most people, anyway. For me, more problematic is the implication of the ad itself – that to them, the very fact that he was willing to concede a single inch, or say something positive about McCain, even just acknowledge that McCain is at all informed or intelligent or, you know, a human being, makes him a failure and serves as proof of his inability to lead. For them, if Obama acknowledges that McCain is right about one thing, it necessarily follows that 1) McCain is right about all things, and 2) Obama is wrong about all things.

I think that says a lot about what kind of administration McCain would run. It’s pretty much the same administration Bush ran – you’re either with us, or you’re against us. You’re either Christian, or you’re going to hell. You want every zygote to turn into a human, or else you’re a raving baby-murderer. You either support the nuclear family, or you’re a child molester who wants to undermine society and demolish the institution of marriage or marry your pet goat. If you aren’t a conservative, then you’re a radical left winger. You can either put complete and utter faith in the free market, or you can fess up to being a rabid socialist. You’re a blind supporter of US policy, or you’re a terrorist. You’re either a Republican, or you hate your country. If you try to reach over to the other side… you are weak. Oh, and you hate your country.

This most recent ad proves that John McCain will bring more of the same. After all, he’s John McCain, and he approves of this message.


You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Bookmark and Share

10 Responses to “Politeness, tact, and diplomacy: Signs of weakness? McCain thinks so!”

  1. Carl Forestieri Says:

    Well said.

  2. McCain could have started dialog on a more decent level.
    Instead, all he can do is try to rip the Obama apart
    with out of context sound bites. I’m sure Obama will
    now have to respond in kind. It has been McCain’s fault
    that this election has become so cut throat. It’s so
    sad that more people don’t see what the republicans do,
    and judge them accordingly.

  3. I agree with you. Wait, does that make me weak or thinker to can look at both sides of a story and find some common ground. Please oh please elect someone with a higher GPA then me(3.2). Aren’t we all just tired of these below average out of touch rich kids running the country?

    I’m Leroy B. and I approve this message.

  4. I want a leader that can effectively deal with all the grey. John McCain’s insistence that the surge is “winning” is so far off the mark. What are we winning? It will be years before we can declare a win in Iraq. Over the next few years I want a leader that can diplomatically recoup or place in the world as respected a leader nation rather than the biggest bully. We should not attack another nation without clear and universally recognized world support. To act as the world’s cop we need the support of the world.
    John McCain’s political ADS are factually wrong most of the time and appeal to our base fears or instincts. It is time we reject this once and for all time by overwhelmingly electing Barak Obama president.

  5. Hercules Mulligan Says:

    LEFTISTS you are the ones that are despeate. The polls claiming a Obama victory are those manipullated by liberals.
    The stupidity of pledging opening the BOMBING of Pakistan, an allied that has confronted tough situations with the extremist Terrorism during the last ten years, is not only vulgar but a blunder.
    Here are the Leftists Democratas calling President Bush “a cowboy”. Mr.Obama not only claiming sending more soldiers into Afganistan but it is ready to OPEN A THIRD FRONT (in Pakistan) in this war.
    HONOR: Geroge Washington and Alenxander Hamilton, the two true patriots that made possible the Change in America.
    VOTE: McCain/Palin

  6. There is just no two ways about it. Obama and McCain come from two different worlds. Their ages are proof of that. But I am 56 and I want to get out of Iraq. Many lives are being lost and much money is getting spent in a place we should not have gone in the first place. There is no dignity in staying in a place where no one asked you to come. History will record this. It will also make us look like we were warmongers who don’t know when to cut and run.

    Also, why Obama did not mention that Georgia taunted Russia first, is beyond me. This is probably the only mistake he made last night. This is also the reason why Putin and Chavez are getting closer and closer as we speak. They feel threatened by us. Colin Powell mentioned that Georgia acted first on the Sec. of State interview last week and people seem to be ignoring it.

    Obama is an offer we can’t refuse. If McCain did not have enough smarts not to take us into Iraq, what makes people think he has enough good judgment not to take us into a war with another country? McCain may be able to talk a good game, but actions speak louder then words! He is hot-headed and seems to have a problem with countries who don’t speak English.

  7. I don’t understand this ad.
    Barack Obama says John McCain is right three times. The voice over asks if he is ready to lead based on these statements and concludes, I guess because he agrees with John McCain, that obviously he is not. The message: anybody who agrees with John McCain is not ready to lead. But what does that say about John McCain?

  8. Hannah Stevens Says:

    I think it became even more clear all of this week who we need to be sitting at that desk in the oval office with the red button at his side. And it wouldn’t be John McCain. The drama and theatrics, political grandstanding that he did this week cinched it for me. I want a clear thinking, calm, cool, confident person in that office, able to negotiate our way out of this mess in America and in the world that the bush people got us into. Obama is that man. McCain may have more experience, heavens he’s lived a lot longer. But has he learned from his experiences and does he use good judgment? His pick for VP is one example of extremely poor judgment, and then this week saying that he was suspending his campaign, which he didn’t do by the way (he lied) to help out in Washington, which just confused matters more. John McCain is always a footstep away from and accident waiting to happen.

  9. The next president can’t possibly fix all that has gone wrong during these past eight years, but I can’t imagine doing anything as crazy as voting for McCain. With the cuts McCain proposed, we’ll all “have to own a gun” to survive. Which is why gun lobbyists will vote for McCain.

    Obama will be a great President. I think Obama will win by a large margin, if not a landslide.

    I wish Ted Kennedy many good weeks and months. He’s out of the hospital. Sadly, McCain tried to draw attention to himself by mentioning Kennedy being in the hospital. McCain’s behavior bothers me. PS We love you Ted. Wishing you many good days, weeks and months ahead.

  10. Thank you for your comment Hannah Stevens. The one issue that stood out for me during the debate was when McCain said–in an obvious slam against Obama–that he doesn’t need on-the-job-training when he entered office. The only thing I kept thinking was `Is that how he feels about his running mate?’ I mean, c’mon! How can he question, in good conscience, Obama’s readiness to lead when his own running mate hasn’t traveled outside the country yet believes Alaska’s proximity to Russia gives her an edge on foreign policy? I don’t understand it. When the economic situation was thrown at him, I was waiting for McCain to outline, at least a little, on his part in the Washington negotiations. Dead silence. He says he’s gonna suspend his campaign, and wants the debate to be postponed so that he could address the economic crisis. Now 12 hours or so later he’s on his way to Mississippi. What the hell was that? I think Obama went toe-to-toe with this guy and he did’t back down. If he didn’t seem credible before, he did last night. Age is nothing but a number. More life experience is a given as we get older but wisdom is actually CHOICE. It doesn’t automatically come with age.

Leave a Reply