Want to help support Obscanity.com?
Use my Shopping Portal to make your holiday purchases! It won't cost you an extra cent, but it'll help support this site. Doing all your shopping at Amazon.com? Go there now!







Netflix, Inc.



Blingo



“I’m not racist, but you’re black! Black, black, BLACK!” | The Bilerico Project

October 17th, 2009 [General]

3 Comments »

“I’m not racist, but you’re black! Black, black, BLACK!” | The Bilerico Project.

I am so goddamned sick of people assigning whiteness to Jews. What the hell? Have these people ever been Jewish in a room full of white people? You know you’re not white – and more importantly, SO DO THEY.

No, we don’t know what it’s like to be African-American. No, we don’t know what it’s like to be Chicano/a. No, we don’t know what it’s like to be Asian/Pacific Islander. But YES, we know what it’s like to be Something Other Than White. We know what it’s like for people to attribute the actions of individuals to our entire community. We know what it’s like for the mainstream to form obnoxious stereotypes and caricatures of our perceived physical features, cultural traditions, sexuality, gender expression, and personality traits. We know what it’s like to have people make assumptions about our trustworthiness and morality based on our ethnicity. We know what it’s like to carry the collective burden and psychological damage of surviving generations of persecution and genocide and, simultaneously, to have people tell us, “It wasn’t that bad,” or “You weren’t even there,” or, “It was so long ago – will you just get over it already?”

We know what it’s like to lose our languages, some of us because our parents so desired assimilation that they refused to teach it to us, and some of us because our children resist learning it. We know what it’s like to have people scream racial epithets at our children from passing cars. We know what it’s like for our neighbors to regard us by our identity first and our personality second, and to whip out the epithets the minute they get mad at us for something personal. We know what it’s like to feel completely alienated from the K-12 curriculum because let’s face it, that’s not OUR literature or history – except maybe for a couple of lessons when we get to learn how much more it sucked to be us in the past. We know what it’s like to have people tell us we’re playing a race card, crying wolf, or being overly sensitive if we dare to mention examples of racism against us. We know what it’s like to be pressured into observing mainstream national celebrations which serve as stark reminders of our own persecution throughout the years. We know what it’s like for people to question our patriotism and loyalty to this country because we “come from somewhere else,” even if we’ve been here for generations.

Many of us knew what a bomb threat was before we knew what sex was, and experienced the former a decade before the latter. We know what it’s like to dread the slightest bit of conflict – be it international conflict or domestic economic turmoil – because our schools, community centers and places of worship will inevitably either receive said bomb threats or be shot up by racist wingnuts who don’t give a shit if they shoot adults or toddlers, because we’re all the same to them. We know what it’s like to be blamed.

So maybe we don’t know what it’s like to be you – but you don’t know what it’s like to be us, either.

That said…

I think we need to acknowledge that many of us – particularly Ashkenazim, but some Sephardim too – can ‘pass’ as white, particularly in large urban areas. However, 1) not all of us can pass; 2) our ability to pass depends on the presence of people who *don’t* look white; and 3) our passing depends on our willingness to be silent about who we are – a Semitic people who may happen to have white features mixed into our gene pool as a result of centuries of rape and violence. Intermarriage and conversion have become factors in the last couple of generations, but for most white-looking Jews, it’s mostly gonna be about rape and pogroms. Where did you think we came up with matrilineal descent, anyway?

This puts us in an awkward position; to people of color, we’re “white Europeans,” but to white Europeans, we’re Jews – we weren’t white OR European in Europe, so why would we be white AND European here? Case in point: I had my grandfather tested via one of those ancestral DNA companies. It doesn’t matter how long our family spent in eastern Europe. His DNA – that of his father’s father’s father – still carries the stamp of the Mediterranean / Fertile Crescent. We’re JEWS no matter how you spin it.

Now, don’t get me wrong – many of us absolutely are privileged by our skin color, to the extent that we are willing to shut our mouths and accept that privilege without dissenting about the way that privilege is distributed or withheld. And there are some complex issues within the Jewish community, e.g. confusion about – or more often suspicion of – black Jews, and also color-based tension and social/economic inequality between Ashkenazim and Sephardim. But more than anything else, I think a lot of this conflict and complexity is the result of 1) the “passability” of Ashkenazim, and therefore 2) Ashkenazi Jews being willing to take on this mantle of whiteness as though it belongs to us. There are definitely some Jews who self-identify as white, Jews who are happy to play the white role for the sake of keeping the privilege they get from their light skin and from relying on the oppression of people of color to distract white people from their own difference. Call me crazy, but I think that’s irresponsible – and yes, RACIST. We owe it to ourselves not to accept it.

If nothing else, it is a horrible insult to those millions of Jews who perished in the Holocaust precisely because they weren’t white. And this is not to say, “Let’s resist whiteness because the Nazis were white.” That’s not what I mean here. It’s deeper than that – I’m asking, what is the prize here? What is the lesson to be learned from the Holocaust – that Jews should fight to achieve whiteness? Maybe that’s one component of the endless turmoil in Israel – the faction of right-wing extremists who believe that our prize for enduring the Holocaust is the right to be Just Like Them – not Nazis, per se, but people who assert their privilege at the expense of others’ well-being. That’s a huge generalization that misses the complexities of Zionism, Jewish nationalism, but I think it’s still a legitimate observation.

So again I ask, have we truly won anything when all we can say is, “At long last, we Jews are granted access to whiteness, so long as we also succumb to assimilation and agree to participate in the perpetuation of alleged white superiority”? Is that a prize worth winning? It’s not one that I want. Shouldn’t we have our eye on the real prize, a society where we can acknowledge people’s different ancestral roots and heritages without assigning supremacy to one group over others? Do we have to live in a melting pot, or can we aim to live in a giant stew where we can layer flavors and spices without losing our own shape and texture?


You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Bookmark and Share

3 Responses to ““I’m not racist, but you’re black! Black, black, BLACK!” | The Bilerico Project”

  1. Great post, and this is something I think about a lot.

    I think actually, weirdly, that Jewish identity and queer identity are similar in this way. I don’t know if you were at the lectures the law school put on (in conjunction with the business school) about the passage of Prop. 8 last spring, but there was a lot of talk about queerness as an “invisible minority category” — that is, you can’t tell by looking at (most) queers whether they’re queer or not, certainly not in the same way that you can (often) tell if a black or an East Asian person is black or East Asian immediately upon meeting them. There are always a few for whom it’s relatively obvious, but that’s largely as the result of outer, choice-related factors, such as style of clothing, haircuts, etc. This sort of complicates the status of the minority, and makes them relatively invisible, because it’s so easy to pass as something else.

    Jewishness is similar in this regard. If you’re not wearing a kippa or tsitsis, if you’re willing to eat at Burger King or Taco Bell, if you text on Shabbos or don’t take Tisha b’Av off work — that is to say, if you don’t choose to broadcast your identity — then it’s easy to pass as something else. On the one hand this can privilege us for sure — especially those Jews who can pass for white, rather than say, a Sefardi who passes for Armenian or Irani or something. Even if it’s not a conscious choice to pass, the majority will simply ascribe the least-minority category to us automatically, and thus bestow white privilege in whatever ways is relevant or appropriate to the situation.

    I wonder if this doesn’t underprivilege in a weird way too, and I have to admit I’m not sure how this would apply to Jews. I know that for a long time, the queer community argued (and I think continues to argue) against passing, as undermining the queer rights movement. As long as people continue to pass, then non-queers don’t know how many queers there really are, assume there are fewer, and thus have an easier time ignoring or trivializing demands for rights. So, queers end up remaining underprivileged because they don’t speak up and identify themselves as queer.

    I don’t know if this would work the same way for Jews. I certainly can’t think of an obvious example why it would work this way, I just wonder if it’s the case that the “invisibility” of our minority has contributed to perpetuation of prejudice and marginalization.

  2. Just as a weird coincidence, here’s a blog post which is mostly quite good, but which gave me pause at the first quoted text (in italics, about halfway through).

    http://stuffwhitepeopledo.blogspot.com/2009/10/shuttle-ambivalently-between-whiteness.html

    Here’s the quote:

    “The leader of an anti-racism workshop in the 1990s once noted a disquieting inclination on the part of white participants to dissociate themselves from the advantages of whiteness by emphasizing some purportedly not-quite-white ethnic background. ‘I’m not white; I’m Italian,’ one would say. Another, ‘I’m Jewish.’ After this ripple had made its way across the group, the seminar leader was left wondering, ‘What happened to all the white people who were here just a minute ago?'”

    While I don’t think that the blog itself can be read this way — and I’ll definitely be returning to this guy’s blog later on, he seems pretty fab — the quote seems to contextualize the phrase “I’m not white, I’m Jewish” as a lame attempt on the part of a person who is really white to try and tap into a minority identity in order to avoid a charge of implicit racism. I think this is also a common assumption on the part of people — at least I know I’ve seen that reaction before when I’ve responded “Jewish” (or “Italian,” for that matter) to a question of ethnicity. But I never saw it that way. Most of the ethnic groups I can reasonably identify with WERE minorities for the vast majority of American history, and STILL suffer from racist stereotypes today. I recognize that I get white privilege in some cases by default. Still, pretending that I and my people(s) are no longer the butt of racism because we are sometimes able to access white privilege seems to me to be just as silly as pretending that black people don’t experience discrimination any more because one of them is President.

    Still, I’d love to hear thoughts on this from someone who can’t access white privilege. Faith, maybe? 🙂

    (Oh, sorry I’m hogging up your blog comments…I just keep finding new stuff related to this issue, it seems.)

  3. Kate – no worries hogging the blog comments; I get very few anyway, except for people hoping to sell me Viagra.

    I think it kind of works in the opposite direction with Jews. With gay people I think the perception is that there’s this itty bitty group of queens in San Fransisco demanding that the entire country bend over backwards to cater to their whims. When people come out, I think it works toward dispelling that myth. But with Jews I think it’s different. I think people are so paranoid about the fact that they *don’t* know who is Jewish, and who isn’t, that it contributes to this feeling that there’s a vast Jewish conspiracy, that we’re everywhere, that something has to be done to rein us in, that we have all this influence, that you never know when a Jew may be lurking around the corner – in the extreme view, that we’re Satan’s little minions, pseudo-humans, sent to destroy the white race precisely because we pass, and that our goal is to contaminate the white genetic pool with our Jewtastic blood. There are people who really do believe this.

    The fact is that there really aren’t all that many of us. Yet we manage to get blamed whenever things go wrong (despite popular opinion, Bernie Madoff is NOT singlehandedly responsible for the collapse of the US economy, nor did every Jew in the nation secretly know about his scheme). Even people who thought they loved God’s little chosen people are suddenly starting to wonder how much of this mess is our fault. And I believe fully that 1930’s Germany could happen here. I don’t know that it would escalate to the point that it did there, but it wasn’t that long ago that America rounded up the Japanese population. As a nation, we’re kind of dumb that way.

    p.s. note that some Sephardim do pass for white, and some Ashkenazim don’t.

    p.p.s. I read an interesting point of view in one of my class readings – that it’s not so much that we’re in a “post-racial” society as that people had the choice between having our first black president and our first woman president, and they chose the black president. It doesn’t mean we’ve gotten over racism; it just means we haven’t gotten over sexism. Not to diminish the hugeness of having a black president, because that *is* huge and long overdue… but I wonder, if Obama was the same person, only a woman, and Hillary was the same person, only a man… who would have won? Just a thought, not necessarily one I subscribe to.

Leave a Reply